Also, Huck basically says that these men
are expected to be con men. That there
status makes it expected and almost acceptable for them to be crooks. This can be seen on page 179 in the conversation
between Jim and Huck. Once again, Jim
seems to be the voice that is attempting to guide Huck down the righteous and
kind path. Jim understands what good
social responsibility is, while Huck does not.
Then later, huck actually tells someone the truth and I was like WOAAA is
Huck actually following social responsibility (of telling people the truth)? I thought that was something good Huck was
doing (four for you huck finn, you go huck finn).
When the con men have a fight later in the
chapters, I was thinking that they were cons for too long. They are even thinking about conning their
partner. And also, I was thinking that
when a person is a con artist, criminal, gangster, and so on. Do they have a responsibility to continue
rejecting social responsibility? It is a
crazy concept but it makes some sense.
No comments:
Post a Comment